Design | Evident Creation

Category Archives: Design

EYE ORIGINS: Part II

August 22, 2020 Brett MIler One comment

Is Nature or Intelligence Responsible for Eye Design? Can the processes of biology create an eye? Nature only has one known mechanism for creating new material or designs, that is random mutation. Natural selection would only become part of the creative process after mutations have either accidentally created something new or accidentally modified an existing sequence that has a positive or negative impact on the ability for an organism to survive. Since natural selection is often mistakenly thought to be

REALITY MATTERS

February 9, 2019 Brett MIler One comment

As some materialists try to make sense out of their interpretation of reality they have debated whether our existence is indeed reality or if we are part of a simulation. Why is there a debate? Because the mathematical properties of the physical universe are in conflict with what their beliefs have compelled them to deny, that the universe is intelligently designed. Should we call scientists considering this idea Simulated Design Creationists? Scientific American called the idea that we live in

Read more Design

WHALES EVOLVED NOT

April 24, 2014 Brett MIler 6 comments

While studying whale evolution and looking at what type of evidence is presented, I found that no macro evolutionary evidence was presented from a biological process for several critical integrated biological systems. The evidence was mainly from homology and fossil placement and it assumed undocumented and unexamined biological changes throughout millions of years. Evolution was given credit, without scientific analysis of biological processes. Of course, this is typical of evolutionary science. No mutational evidence was presented, but many things could

THE EVOLUTIONISTS HAVE A BRIDGE TO SELL YOU

April 9, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

To illustrate irreducible complexity can be accomplished by evolution rather than being evidence for intelligent design Talk Origins attempts to show that adding parts to a structure can create irreducible complexity; therefore evolution is responsible for all irreducibly complex structures and systems in biology. They believe this evidence makes the irreducible complexity argument silly. http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/comdesc/ICsilly.html But does it seem silly to them because they miss the point or don’t understand it? Think about what is said here: “This is why

THE FLAWED EYE: A TRIUMPH OF DESIGN

February 23, 2014 Brett MIler One comment

The argument from bad design, unnecessary design or unlikely design, i.e. “a designer wouldn’t do it that way” is very often used to prop up natural selection or homology arguments because they are scientifically weak. It is mostly used as a straw man argument against design. THE ARGUMENT FROM BAD DESIGN It really adds nothing to the understanding of how the feature in question would occur naturally. It’s heavily bogged down with subjectivity, who’s standard of perfection are we supposed

COMPLEXITY AND SPECIFIED COMPLEXITY

February 16, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

Specified complexity exists in only two places, life and things designed by life. This fact is supported by many observations and experiments that started centuries ago and continue in top science labs today. Complexity is a relative term. Technically, by definition something becomes complex as soon as it has more than two parts. But complexity for us is based on two things, the amount of data there is to consider and also our familiarity with what we are considering. The

Read more Design

HOW TO STUDY CREATION

February 7, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

What kind of scientific experiment would you do to determine if something were created by intelligence or formed through natural processes? Would testing something chemically prove it was designed? Only if you knew that the chemicals were unable to produce that combination or arrangement without intelligence. You would not only have to set up experiments to test the natural properties of the chemicals involved but you would have to be reasonably sure that the chemicals would not normally produce the

Read more Design

PROBLEMS & SOLUTIONS

January 8, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

Problems do not naturally produce solutions. Solutions are a result of intelligence. Therefore one of the best evidences for the intelligent design of life is that life is problem solving. Problems solving is the ability to utilize and or go beyond the natural tendencies of something to find a solution to a perceived problem. Problems are also the result of intelligence. That is, problems don’t exist unless there is a goal that needs to be met. Goals are established by

Read more Design

THE TRUE ROLE OF NATURAL SELECTION AND VARIATION

January 7, 2014 Brett MIler 2 comments

As evolutionists often see it, natural selection is the primary force behind evolution. It has great creative powers, the ability to test, experiment, augment and modify. Its decisions are genius, brilliant and powerful. This makes natural selection one of the most abused concepts in evolutionary thinking. Take a look at just a few examples of how it is treated from evolutionary sources. “But if humans can make new varieties of plants and animals, must not nature do so also… If

Read more Design