Answering the Critics | Evident Creation

Category Archives: Answering the Critics

INDISPUTABLE FACTS

April 5, 2014 Brett MIler 4 comments

In a section called Forum, in the January 2013 issue of Scientific American a one page article called “Creation, Evolution and Indisputable Facts,” written by a fifth grade schoolteacher, Jacob Tanenbaum, has an embarrassing number of factual, analytical and logical errors, misinformation and fallacious arguments. Besides the exaltation of science as a savior, it also exhibits a disturbing trend among materialists, that being the vilification of Bible believing Christians and the belief that they are a threat to our very

THE LYING SPIRIT

February 19, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

An alleged Bible contradiction that actually proves the Bible internally consistent. Why present alleged contradictions in the Bible as amazing evidence for the Bible’s accuracy? For one, proof of the Bibles accuracy comes from the fact that it stands up to the critic’s accusations. Let’s say you are examining a bulletproof vest. How do you test the claim that it’s bulletproof? You shoot at it. The critics provide endless ammunition to test the Bible for accuracy. They shoot lots of

ALLEGED SCIENTIFIC ERRORS IN THE BIBLE

February 18, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

This is a list of a few of the supposed scientific errors and problems in the Bible that its critics have claimed they have found. Are bats called birds? And these are they which you shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle,…And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat. (Leviticus 11:13-19) A similar list can be found in Deuteronomy 14:11-18. The problem

THE ARGUMENT FROM BAD DESIGN

February 8, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

“Why should a rat run, a bat fly and a porpoise swim, and I type this essay with the structures built of the same bones unless we all inherited them from a common ancestor. An engineer starting from scratch could design a better limb in each case.” Former Evolutionist Steven J. Gould One of the arguments that evolutionists often put forth is that there are many poorly designed systems in life. This, they claim is evidence of evolution. Why?

NONSENSE REASONS FOR REJECTING INTELLIGENT DESIGN

January 10, 2014 Brett MIler Leave a comment

These are just of the few of the reasons given from various sources including scientists, educators, the media and other individuals who have put their faith in evolution and materialism. This is not an exhaustive list nor is this a list of standardize reasons put forth by any evolutionary, materialistic or state run organization. Science cannot determine if a transcendent designer exists. If a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to hear it does it make